Tuesday, March 19, 2013

TUESDAY 19th _ WORKSHOP Session 1: Students Presentations

Students Presentations: This workshop session will be focused on presenting previous work done by students from each university. This work will mainly present the territorial analysis students have developed previously to this International Studio. 

Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá
1. Urban - Rural Border in the locality of Usme, Bogotá
Oscar Vaca, student of Master in Habitat.
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B5RG2y01G-0kNkphNUNKd1UxVTQ/edit?usp=sharing

2. Urban Edge on the eastern hills of Bogotá Localidad San Cristóbal
Camila Carreño & Sebastian Mateus, Students Graduate Programme of Architecture
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B5RG2y01G-0kLXZjVGF2TDVOTm8/edit?usp=sharing


Master in Urban Planning, GSAPP, Columbia University, New York City
1. Growth management in Medellin, Colombia: Negotiating stronger public-private-community partnerships in barrio upgrading
Lissa Barrows, Roger Bu, Ellis Calvin, Anne Krassner, Natalie Quinn, Jet Richardson, Gillian Sollenberger. Prof. Clara Irazábal. T.A. Nicole Buchholz

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B5RG2y01G-0kUWpYLWZNYXJJUWc/edit?usp=sharing


Master of International Cooperation Sustainable Emergency Architecture, International University of Catalunya, Barcelona
1. Medellín: Growth and Risk Plan
Shareen Elnaschie, Benja Monrabal, Kimberly Pelkofsky, Nataly Raab, Tara Whelan
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B5RG2y01G-0kSDh0cnB2LXZLeXc/edit?usp=sharing
2. Transformin Medellín
Allison Koornneef, Ryan Matthews
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B5RG2y01G-0kZEg3VG95WHVRNkE/edit?usp=sharing
3. CM + Medellín
Giselle Sebag, Diana Martínez
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B5RG2y01G-0kZ1lnYWE1N19OMU0/edit?usp=sharing


Master in Urban and Regional Planning, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Medellín
1. Conceptualzation, Characterization and Proposal 
Juan Pablo Vallejo, Natalie Montoya, José Valencia, Alejandro Botero, Alejandro González, Carolina Ledesma, Diego Salas, Jenny Sepúlveda, Sandra Ríos, Alba Siguencia, Luis Ángel, Camilo Guarín, Jaime Moreno, Carlos Velásquez, Hamlet Valencia, Diego Zapata
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B5RG2y01G-0kcjl2dUhhZ3R0NzA/edit?usp=sharing

Pictures available at http://www.flickr.com/photos/94378416@N05/sets/72157633094658023/

TUESDAY 19th _ WORKSHOP GUIDELINES

Workshop Approach
By understanding three different narratives this approach aims to focus on providing the path to develop strategies for delivering specific projects or achieve particular objectives through the exploration of new roles and consensus in a public – community partnership.

Illustration 1 Approach to build up a common ground


Premises
  • The intervention requires guaranteeing the inhabitants permanence in the territory
  • Any intervention or process involves the generation of agreements with the local communities and its organizations.
  • The intervention in the metropolitan border is only one component of policy of growth management (multiscale and multidimenctional)  


Illustration 2 Participatory management Model[1]


Themes:
Outlined from the proposals established by the Planning and Management Council of Commune 8 (CPG):

  1. Risk management (gestión del riesgo)
  2. Access to affrodable public utilities (acsequiblilidad a servicios públicos)
  3. Generation of income sources and food security (livelihoods and exchange capabilities) (Generación de ingresos, capacidad de intercambio y seguridad alimentaria)
  4. Promote Integral Barrio Upgrading -habitat and housing, public space, mobility and public facilities (Promoción de mejoramiento integral de barrios)
  5. Implement a public – community partnership management scheme (Implementación de un esquema de gestión de asociación póblico comunitario)

Workshop Methodology
  1. SESSION 1: Tuesday 19th: Students presentation & Groups organization
Urban borders in Bogotá

  • Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá

Comuna 8 Case of study: Territorial analysis and characterization, approaches and proposal.

  • Columbia University
  • International University of Catalunya
  • Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Medellín
Table 2 Groups organization

  1. SESSION 2: Wednesday 20th: Brainstorming
Brainstorming alternative strategies in each theme from a multidimensional approach

Considering the following dimensions

Political Dimension: Legal (Actors-power dynamics - tension - potential)

  • Institutional state
  • Legislative framework
  • Land tenure
  • Real Estate Management
Economic Dimension: Productive (Interdependence urban socio-productive)

  • Production systems
  • Employment and income
  • Informal land market and housing

Environmental Dimension: Landscape (restrictions on development-preservation potential)

  • Ecological Network and landscape units
  • Threats and risk
  • SDP

Physical Dimension: urban physical space (articulation - public systems - living conditions)

  • Morphology and processes of urban structure
  • Structuring Systems (mobility)
  • Structuring Systems (public Space and equipment)
  • Housing and population dynamics
Socio-cultural dimension:  (imaginary - invisible borders - conflicts and population dynamics)

  • Organization and community participation / neighborhood and territorial collective processes
  • Population dynamics: Displacement, Networks and social fabric
  • Socio-cultural and collective needs. Managers

Distinguish between existing and new alternatives


Table 3 Proposed matrix for the exercise

  1. SESSION 3: Thursday 21st: Scenarios
Elaborating different scenarios
1. Within current conditions (status quo)
2. Ideal / Normative

  1. SESSION 4: Friday 22st: Final presentation
10.00 – 12.00 am Development of Strategies & Proposal
05.00 – 08.00 pm Final Presentation and discussion

Workshop Schedule
Table 4 Proposed scheduled

General Outcomes
  1. Identification of main findings and common ground from the multidimensional analysis of the territory and the proposed approach.
  2. Definition of action lines and strategies for growth management addressing to promote high quality, viable, equitable, productive, and sustainable development through the exploration of new roles and consensus in a public – community partnership.
  3. Public presentation




[1] Source: Plan de Desarrollo Local Comuna 8 2008 – 2018 p. 26

TUESDAY 19th _ MEETINGS: Planning and Management Council of Commune 8 (CPG)

PARTICIPANTS:
Community Leaders
Planning and Management Council of Commune 8 (CPG-8)

OBJECTIVE:
This meeting was addressing to establish a comprehensive dialogue with leaders of the community who has been developing a Local Development Plan based from a participatory approach addressing to achieve the social construction of the habitat.

The purpose of this meeting was to tackle the historic trajectory of grassroots planning efforts in Comuna 8 and current proposals regarding the metropolitan green belt project. Community leaders presented the results of their Local Development Plan and the process of Social Construction of Habitat as basis for their territorial visions and projects. In particular, the claims of the Displaced population committee are relevant inasmuch as most of the population settled in the fringes are victims of forced displacement. Additionally, one of the leaders showed the results of a process of social cartography exploring the location of significant places and the way local communities envision a dignified housing layout. Finally, community leaders laid out the proposed political platform to interrogate the greet belt project. 






PRESENTATIONS:
This presentations were preapred by Planning and Management Council of Commune 8 (CPG-8). 


Local Development Plan

Social Construction of Habitat